FOTBAL - CORUPTIE: Stenograma Becali - Petre Marin - Mirel Radoi

Dezvoltam aici subiectul actelor de coruptie care au tocat fotbalul romanesc in ultimii ani, de cand Gigi Becali a devenit un actor important al acestuia, odata cu venirea lui ca patron la Steaua Bucuresti.

Vom detalia pe rand aspecte care tin de stenogramele discutiilor avute, de-a lungul timpului, de catre Becali, cu diferiti oameni de fotbal si din fotbal. Din aceste stenograme rezulta clar felul in care Gigi Becali a intoxicat fotbalul nostru, impreuna cu acolitii sai.

Nu insistam aici asupra stenogramei discutiei dintre Becali si patronul Universitatii Craiova, Adrian Mititelu, pe care am prezentat-o acum cateva zile. Ea este prezenta si in documentul care contine discutiile lui Gigi Becali cu fotbalistii sai, Mirel Radoi si apoi Petre Marin.

Pe 6 mai, la orele pranzului, Petre Marin i-a confirmat lui Becali ca a discutat cu Gigel Coman, "caruia i-a comunicat ca o sa fie sunat de o persoana care va veni la Cluj, solicitandu-i sa le transmita jucatorilor ca banii vor ajunge la ei", arata rechizitoriul DNA.

Intrebare: ne putem imagina ca acest sportiv admirabil, de 34 de ani, in conditiile in care Becali il baga in mizeriile sale, transformandu-l intr-un potential infractor, mai avea creier si sa joace fotbal la nivel de varf?

Mai mult, avea si initiativa, il suna si pe Silvasan (intre timp ajuns la Gloria Bistrita, autorul unei tentative de sinucidere), care insa nu a raspuns. Mirel Radoi, si el plin de idei de afaceri, i-a spus lui Becali ca a discutat cu Claudiu Raducanu, care i-a confirmat ca jucatorii de la U Cluj ii cunosteau oferta.

Radoi, un jucator care a scazut valoric mult in ultimii ani si este plin de accidentari ca maidanezul de purici, i-a atras atentia lui Becali ca exista posibilitatea ca politia sa intervina. Daca mai era nevoie, Gigi Becali a confirmat planul de a folosi o fabulatorie tranzactie imobiliara ca motiv pentru care oamenii sai erau la Cluj.

Raul trebuie taiat de la radacina. Un moment zero veritabil, anticoruptie, este necesar fotbalului romanesc. Acesti oameni trebuie sa plateasca pentru infractiunile lor.

FOTBAL - CORUPTIE: Stenograma Becali - Sponte

Dezvoltam aici subiectul actelor de coruptie care au tocat fotbalul romanesc in ultimii ani, de cand Gigi Becali a devenit un actor important al acestuia, odata cu venirea lui ca patron la Steaua Bucuresti.

Vom detalia pe rand aspecte care tin de stenogramele discutiilor avute, de-a lungul timpului, de catre Becali, cu diferiti oameni de fotbal si din fotbal.

Din aceste stenograme rezulta clar felul in care Gigi Becali a intoxicat fotbalul nostru, impreuna cu acolitii sai.

Revenim acum la un episod fundamental, cel in care Gigi Becali in instruieste pe nepotul sau, Teia Sponte, sa mearga la Cluj impreuna cu "alte doua persoane", cum arata rechizitoriul DNA, unde, prin intermediul lui Gigel Coman, jucator la U Cluj si fost jucator la Steaua, sa transmita jucatorilor clujeni mesajul dat in printscreen.

In continuare, Becali continua sa detalieze lucrurile care trebuie facute pentru edificarea aranjamentului in sine. Urmeaza, in acelasi document la care am dat link, o discutie intre Teia Sponte si omul lui Anton Dobos, patronul U Cluj pe atunci, Traian Bendorfean.

Acest domn cu nume de ulei mineral pentru motoare era desemnat de Dobos sa il reprezinte, la hotel, in perioada in care are loc meciul si se pregateste regizarea mituirii, pentru ca partile implicate in aranjament sa fie sigure ca lucrurile merg conform intelegerii.

Era nevoie de Bendorfean, pentru ca Tony Dobos era extrem de prudent. Eu sunt convins ca aceasta metoda de lucru a fost rafinata indelung, ani in sir, de catre Gigi Becali, cu diferiti interlocutori pe post de oameni folositi la astfel de aranjamente.

Au fost si situatii in care Becali era atat de sigur ca nimeni nu poate sa-i spuna nimic, inainte de schimbarea Regulamentului FRF, incat pur si simplu a urmarit autocarul unei echipe cu Maybachul sau, scena notorie si antologica in mass-media, la timpul respectiv.

FOTBAL - CORUPTIE: Stenograma Becali - Sponte - Netoiu

Dezvoltam aici subiectul actelor de coruptie care au tocat fotbalul romanesc in ultimii ani, de cand Gigi Becali a devenit un actor important al acestuia, odata cu venirea lui ca patron la Steaua Bucuresti.

Vom detalia pe rand aspecte care tin de stenogramele discutiilor avute, de-a lungul timpului, de catre Becali, cu diferiti oameni de fotbal si din fotbal. Din aceste stenograme rezulta clar felul in care Gigi Becali a intoxicat fotbalul nostru, impreuna cu acolitii sai.

Iata ce observa chiar DNA, inainte de transcriptul discutiei lui Gigi Becali cu Teia Sponte, nepotul sau: "[...]in discutia cu oficialul LPF, invinuitul Becali George a recunoscut, in mod voluntar, ca suma de 1,7 milioane de euro era destinata clubului U Cluj, acceptand [...] chiar si o posibila sanctiune pe linie disciplinara din partea FRF. Comportamentul si limbajul folosite de catre acesta pun in evidenta, fara dubiu, intentia sa de premiere a fotbalistilor, in situatia obtinerii un[ui] rezultat favorabil pentru echipa Steaua[...]".

In discutia sa cu Teia Sponte, Becali ii explica acestuia ca nu vor fi probleme in legatura cu invinuirile aduse de catre procurori, deoarece se va apara, spunand ca urma sa faca o sponsorizare catre clubul din Cluj, care nu inseamna mita. Cred ca am scris de vreo zece ori, in intreaga mea cariera, despre diferite mite, date de tot felul de insi, camuflate sub sponsorizari.

Acest dialog cu Sponte face parte din documentul la care piesa de rezistenta este transcriptul dialogului cu Gigi Netoiu. Aici, Becali se suceste: ba a dat banii ca "sponsorizare", ba cele 1,7 milioane de euro ar fi constituit contravaloarea unor terenuri, pe care ar fi dorit sa le cumpere.

Gigi Netoiu il sfatuieste sa o intoarca, explicandu-i ca se complica degeaba, pentru ca poate sa spuna ca, initial, a vrut sa dea o sponsorizare, apoi s-a razgandit si si-a trimis oamenii tot in Cluj, dar pentru un teren.

Dialogul prin care Netoiu il convinge pe Becali, simuland cu el ce trebuie sa spuna in fata DNA, are doza sa de comic. Dincolo de aceasta, astfel vedem cum a construit Becali mitul cu terenul de 1,7 milioane de euro. Pentru care a avut nevoie de niste martori mincinosi. Unul dintre ei a fost selectionerul Nationalei, Victor Piturca.

Transcriptul VIVA TVR

Postez aici transcriptul complet, in engleza, al montajului foarte sugestiv, VIVA TVR, aflat in fisierul atasat mai sus. In pofida lungimii acestuia, importanta acestuia este extrem de mare. Multumesc celui care a facut aceasta traducere excelenta

Draft translation of most the material in the video VIVA TVR http://youtube.com/watch?v=V_Sd6veZz7s

PART ONE: Discussion during the TV show "Ne Vedem la TVR", Romania Television, Channel 1, of Monday, February 25, 15:40 GMT

NB: TVR – Televiziunea Romana - is the national broadcaster of Eurovision, as well as organizer of the Romanian performance etc.

1.1. Mr. Titus Andrei. Musician, works for the national radio, was a member of the jury:

"Though the Swedes had a very good song [and] very good voices, we have to represent our country through ourselves."

1.2. Mrs. Marina Almasan, moderator, wife of member of the jury Victor Socaciu:

"Have you offered the maximum points allowed to the Romanian song?"

1.3. Romanian female journalist, Tatiana Solomon from newspaper Libertatea, that eventually offered the winning points to Nico and Vlad and led to this big score controversy:

"Yes I have, I put my bet on it […] this is my opinion and I assume my opinion [that they deserved those points]."

PART TWO: Now we can see different webpages that have posted materials about the contest. The first deals with the controversy of the Eurovision show, mainly the hypocritical attitude of the national broadcaster TVR (in Romanian). The next 2 pages show messages of support for Biondo (in English).

PART THREE: The discussion in the TVR studio continues with the aforementioned journalist making comments about the accusations launched against her (the points given by her allowed Nico and Vlad to win). She said, these statements [that have appeared in the media] cannot blame anyone.

PART FOUR: A webpage saying: "TVR wants us blind, mute and deaf."

PART FIVE: Back in the TVR studio.

5.1. Mrs. Marina Almasan:

"I quote; I quote; I am not allowed to have an opinion today."

A man's voice in the background for about 1 second.

5.2. Mrs. Marina Almasan:

"I don't know – we, the Romanians, have the skill of not supporting each other."

NB: In spite of the fact that she had mentioned she could not judge herself the situation, her body language, including the smile and other face expressions, and the tone of the voice show the contrary. This can be noticed throughout the remaining interventions during the show.

5.3. Now we can see the barometer indicating the number of signatures for the petition on the topic of plagiarism. From 7,000 to 8,027 to 8,300.

PART SIX: TVR1 shows a SMS in which someone scolds Mrs. Iuliana Marciuc, TVR moderator in the green room, saying that she should be ashamed to appear on screen in the future.

NB. During the intro she made in the final, Mrs. Marciuc introduced Biondo being "the guys from Shine" (she meant, they are the members of the Biondo group); however, someone from the green room corrected her and she, with a big smile, said the right thing. Mrs. Marciuc has been working in television for more than 15 years.

PART SEVEN: A gentleman viewer's call:

7.1. Viewer: (his name is not mentioned in this short clip): "[…] it would have been better if we "had imported" …(read: have a foreign performance)".

7.2. Mrs. Marina Almasan (very ironic – note the smile, the grimaces she makes and the tone of her voice):

"Esteemed mister trainee lawyer of the defense, if you allow me, the moment when, let's say, Biondo had won the selection, no, excuse me, the final contest Eurovision Belgrade 2008, what would you have felt like, deep in your heart, would you have felt that Romania had won?"

7.3. Viewer: "Yes, correct."

7.4. Mrs. Marina Almasan: "Yes?"

7.5. Viewer: "[…] yes,, because we have not managed to send no one …"

7.6. Mrs. Marina Almasan cuts him off; while he is still speaking she thanks him and says:

"Let's continue the discussion ..." (see point 9)

NB: Mrs. Almasan uses 'If clauses type III'. When used, it shows that it is impossible to fulfill a condition which is given in the if-clause. In other words:

In Romanian: "daca Biondo ar fi castigat (if Biondo had won) … dumneavoastra ati fi simtit (you would have felt).

Actually, when used if clauses type 2 – it is theoretically possible to fulfill a condition which is given in the if-clause. In other words: if Biondo still had a chance in this contest, she should/would have said:

In Romanian "daca Biondo castiga/va castiga/ar castiga (if Biondo win) … dumneavoastra va veti simti/v-ati simti (you will feel).

Therefore: Mrs. Almasan does not even consider the possibility that Biondo could represent Romania at the final contest.

PART EIGHT: in the studio the debate continues:

8.1. Mrs. Marina Almasan: "The second item [point of view] …"

8.2. She is interrupted by Mr. Horia Moculescu, composer for maybe more than 30 years, self-declared family friend of Mr. Andrei Tudor's family and very good friend of his father, Mr. Ionel Tudor:

8.3. Mr. Horia Moculescu (determined and straight-forward):

"This second point of view is not convenient/reasonable point of view to neither the organizers, nor the contest itself, or to the music in general."

NB: Mr. Moculescu was a member of the commission that studied the case and ruled that the case was not plagiarism. This is illegal since he had already expressed his point of view in this TV show. The commission gathered after this debate took place.

8.4. Mr. Mihai Pocorschi, musician, composer with about 20 years experience:

"Let's talk about the quality of the song [Shine], which I appreciate, and I think that my colleagues will agree, I reckon we all think it is an extraordinary song. But this is not the point; the point is that we don't live in the time of the Phanariotes in order to hire other soldiers to fight our wars.

NB: The Phanariotes were Greeks from Fener, Constantinopoles (nowadays Istanbul); some were appointed to lead Romanian provinces including Wallachia, instead of local leaders.

PART NINE: Still in the studio:

9.1. Mr. Octavian Ursulescu, TV personality, presenter of music festivals:

"We're talking about Romania. When I say Romania, I say, music specificity [video director intervention with images of Nico singing in Italian in the contest], tradition [video director intervention with images of Vlad singing opera-like in the contest], and the personality of the respective country [Romania]."

9.2. We see a message posted online with the comment that persons that are close to the family of the composer, Mr. Andrei Tudor, should not be part of the jury asked to rule whether plagiarism or not.

9.3. Mrs. Almasan gives the floor to Mr. Catalin Dancu, lawyer:

9.4. Mr. Catalin Dancu: "Regrettably, I am exactly one of those that don't know music. I had the joy to be the student of Ms. Mihaela Runceanu [late Mihaela Runceanu, a very talented artist and musical coach]. I studied canto for 3 years […] when accusing someone of plagiarism one has to prove it.

9.5. The video director makes a presentation of the 'Pe O Margine de Lume" and "La Magia del Corazon" in an overlapped form. The resemblance between Vlad's intro part and David's part, and the chorus parts of both songs is major. The director remarks that Nico's part is not copied.

PART TEN: Mr. Ursulescu continues:

10. Mr. Ursulescu: "I say it again, I think it is normal to be represented [by Romanian artists] in a competition where there appears the name of the country. Again, it is not a song contest, it is a countries' contest."

N.B. The competition is called 'Eurovision Song Contest'. Mr. Ursulescu insisted on the national element and did not know, or ignored, the fact that Eurovision is a song contest, not country contest!

PART ELEVEN: Still in the studio' we don't know how many minutes passed and what happened since the previous topic (10) and this one:

11.1. Mrs. Marina Almasan: "I don't know if there are any comments from the audience on this topic; speak out [if so], please."

NB: I remember there was a journalist from a radio channel, Radio 21, named Rasvan Popescu, trying to make a point about the legitimacy of the public when choosing 'Shine'; this gentleman was not allowed to speak by Mr. Moculescu who intervened forcibly (you can see that in the video):

11.2. Mr. Moculescu: "No, no, you do not have the legitimacy to speak […] out, out, something else now.'

End.

n.n.: Pentru ca vad ca este un soi de rumoare in legatura cu soarta petitiei - in aceste momente, exista niste oameni care alcatuiesc un text explicativ aditional, care sa-i familiarizeze pe cei de la EBU cu cele intamplate in tarisoara noastra. El va fi tradus in engleza, apoi va fi trimis celor de la EBU. Initiatorii petitiei multumesc celor care au ajutat la acest demers.